Red News Daily

Border Security Crisis: Facts & Solutions

Border

Laura Jennings

-

May 25, 2026

Border Security Crisis: Facts & Solutions

The United States faces an unprecedented border security challenge that demands immediate action and a return to law-and-order principles.

In my years serving this country in uniform, I learned that a nation without secure borders is no nation at all—it surrenders its sovereignty the moment it stops enforcing its own laws. The data from recent years lays out the hard truth without any sugarcoating.

Throughout the Biden-Harris years, America’s southern border turned into a sieve, with dire results for national security, public safety, and the rule of law. This situation goes far beyond numbers; it shows a clear failure by the federal government to fulfill its core duty under the Constitution to defend American citizens. When leaders ignore that responsibility, they invite chaos. Conservative principles call for acknowledging the problem head-on and fixing it with strength, enforcement, and respect for legal immigration.

Illegal Border Crossings by Year

Fiscal Year | Total Apprehensions | Estimated Gotaways | Total Encounters
2019 | 859,501 | ~100,000 | ~960,000
2020 | 405,036 | ~80,000 | ~485,000
2021 | 1,659,206 | ~300,000 | ~1,960,000
2022 | 2,376,840 | ~600,000 | ~2,976,840
2023 | 1,738,765 | ~400,000 | ~2,138,765
2024 | 1,486,291 | ~350,000 | ~1,836,291
2025 (Jan-Jun) | 425,000 | ~120,000 | ~545,000

The sharp rise from 2019 to 2022 proves that weak policies produce weak results. The later drop shows what happens when enforcement returns—exactly what the American people deserve. Straight talk on this issue demands we confront the damage done and commit to restoration.

What’s particularly concerning is the pattern of “gotaways”—individuals who evade detection entirely. During peak crisis years, we estimate between 300,000 to 600,000 people crossed illegally without any screening whatsoever. These numbers represent not just a statistical failure, but a genuine security vulnerability. We have no background checks, no health screenings, no vetting of any kind for hundreds of thousands of individuals entering American territory annually. This isn’t merely an immigration issue—it’s a national security imperative that transcends partisan politics.

The composition of border crossers has also shifted dramatically. While family units comprised a significant portion during certain periods, single adult males now represent the largest demographic category. Drug smugglers and cartel operatives exploit these migration corridors precisely because they know enforcement has been inconsistent. The cartels have essentially industrialized human smuggling, turning desperation into profit while maintaining control over migration routes.

Cartel Activity and Drug Trafficking

The border mess ties directly to cartel violence and drug flows. Mexican cartels use the disorder to pump fentanyl and other poisons into our communities. Conservative policy puts American lives first by treating these criminal groups as the threats they are.

Recent Cartel Activity Statistics:
– Fentanyl Seizures (2024): Over 27,000 pounds seized at southern border ports of entry—enough to kill over 6 billion people
– Cartel-Related Deaths: Mexican cartel violence claimed over 250,000 lives since 2006, destabilizing the region
– Opioid Deaths in US: Approximately 107,000 Americans died from opioid overdoses in 2023, with fentanyl accounting for over 70% of deaths
– Methamphetamine Seizures: Nearly 20,000 pounds seized in 2024, representing a 45% increase from 2023
– Human Trafficking: Cartels control migration corridors, charging $8,000-$15,000 per person with no guarantee of safety

The fentanyl crisis represents an existential threat to American public health. A single kilogram of fentanyl can be mixed into larger quantities of other drugs, making detection exponentially more difficult. Our law enforcement agencies report that cartel organizations have become increasingly sophisticated in their smuggling methods—using drones, semi-submersibles, hidden compartments in commercial vehicles, and corrupting officials on both sides of the border. The $27,000 pounds of fentanyl seized in 2024 represents only a fraction of what actually crosses. Border Patrol agents estimate that seizure rates capture perhaps 10-20% of total cartel drug flows, meaning hundreds of thousands of pounds reach American streets undetected.

The economic impact of cartel activity extends far beyond the drug trade itself. American communities face increased healthcare costs treating overdose victims, law enforcement resources diverted to drug-related crimes, and lost productivity from addiction and incarceration. The ripple effects destroy families, destabilize neighborhoods, and undermine the social fabric that strong communities depend upon.

Crime Statistics: Offenses by Illegal Immigrants

Crime Category | 2022 Cases | 2023 Cases | 2024 Cases
Drug Trafficking | 12,847 | 14,263 | 15,891
Assault | 8,934 | 9,721 | 10,456
Theft/Robbery | 6,521 | 7,134 | 7,892
Human Trafficking | 1,247 | 1,456 | 1,823
Illegal Weapon Possession | 4,856 | 5,234 | 5,987
TOTAL CRIMINAL CHARGES | 34,405 | 37,808 | 42,049

Source: U.S. Department of Justice – Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2024 Report

These statistics warrant serious examination. The steady year-over-year increases across all crime categories suggest systemic failure in enforcement and detention. Human trafficking charges alone increased 46% over this two-year period, reflecting the horrific human cost of uncontrolled borders. These aren’t abstract numbers—they represent American citizens assaulted, robbed, and in some cases murdered by individuals who should never have entered the country illegally.

It’s worth noting that these figures represent only individuals apprehended and formally charged. The actual scope of criminal activity is almost certainly higher, as many crimes committed by illegal aliens go unreported or are attributed to transient populations. Community leaders in border states consistently report that property crime, vehicle theft, and human trafficking operations expand during periods of weak enforcement.

Border Wall Construction Progress

The Trump administration’s border wall work from 2017-2021 showed what real commitment looks like. Determined action delivers results, and fiscal responsibility means spending money on proven defenses rather than endless crisis management.

– 2017-2021 Achievement: 450+ miles of new or replacement barriers constructed
– Total Barrier Miles (as of 2025): Approximately 750 miles across approximately 2,000-mile border (37.5%)
– Cost Per Mile: $15-25 million depending on terrain and materials
– Effectiveness: Sectors with barrier construction show 40-60% reduction in illegal crossings
– 2025 Trump Administration Goal: Complete remaining priority sectors and modernize existing structures

The physical barrier represents only one component of comprehensive border security, but it remains an essential one. Engineering studies confirm that barriers significantly reduce crossing attempts in areas where they’re constructed, forcing migrants and smugglers to attempt crossings in more remote, dangerous terrain. This creates natural chokepoints where Border Patrol can concentrate resources more effectively. Modern barrier technology—including sensor systems, reinforced materials, and strategic gate placements—provides cost-effective infrastructure that deters casual crossing attempts while enabling apprehension of those determined to breach the border.

Policy Solutions: Comparative Analysis

The American people have earned leaders who put constitutional duty and border security above politics. Strong borders protect everything else we hold dear—our prosperity, our security, our rule of law, and our ability to control our own immigration policy based on national interest rather than cartels’ interests. The solutions exist. The question is whether our leaders possess the will to implement them.

Sources

Second Amendment Gun Rights

Conservative News

Frank Cavanaugh

-

May 25, 2026

0

The Second Amendment remains one of the clearest lines in our Constitution, protecting the people’s right to keep and bear arms without infringement. In my years serving this country, I learned that a free nation rests on citizens who can defend themselves and their families, not on bureaucrats deciding who gets permission.

The landmark Heller decision in 2008 confirmed that the amendment secures an individual’s right to firearms for lawful purposes like self-defense. McDonald extended that protection to the states. Then Bruen in 2022 struck down New York’s discretionary permitting scheme, pushing more states toward shall-issue or permitless carry. Rahimi upheld limits on those under domestic violence orders when they track historical tradition. Several states have since added their own constitutional safeguards.

The Heller decision was particularly significant because it ended decades of debate about whether the Second Amendment protected collective militia rights or individual rights. The Supreme Court’s 5-4 majority ruled clearly that the right belongs to individuals, not just those serving in organized militias. This fundamental recognition restored constitutional clarity and empowered millions of Americans to exercise their natural right to self-defense without apology. McDonald v. Chicago in 2010 then incorporated that protection against state governments through the Fourteenth Amendment, ensuring that states could not simply nullify Second Amendment rights through local restrictions.

The New York Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen decision fundamentally changed the legal landscape for carry laws across America. By striking down New York’s “proper cause” requirement—which gave officials virtually unlimited discretion to deny permits—the Court established that historical tradition and text must guide Second Amendment jurisprudence. This wasn’t merely a procedural fix; it was a seismic shift that invalidated similar discretionary systems in California, Massachusetts, Hawaii, and other states. Within months, multiple states moved toward constitutional carry or shall-issue permitting. The decision also sent a message that the Court would no longer defer reflexively to government gun-control arguments.

Gun laws still split sharply by state. The five most restrictive—California, New York, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Connecticut—impose assault-weapon bans, magazine limits, background checks, and permitting hurdles. The five least restrictive—Wyoming, Vermont, New Hampshire, Montana, and Alaska—embrace constitutional carry with almost no purchase permits required. Roughly 42 states now allow permitless carry, up from about 25 before Bruen. Nationwide, around 21.5 million active concealed-carry permits exist, with growing participation among women and minorities.

The shift toward constitutional carry reflects a broader recognition that law-abiding citizens shouldn’t need government permission to exercise a constitutional right. Vermont has never required a permit for concealed carry and has maintained one of the lowest violent crime rates in the nation—a fact rarely mentioned by gun-control advocates. Wyoming’s constitutional carry law passed overwhelmingly with bipartisan support. Even traditionally blue states are seeing pushback against restrictive carry laws, with courts increasingly striking down provisions that don’t align with Bruen’s historical test.

Most states recognize stand-your-ground principles and the castle doctrine, removing any duty to retreat when facing imminent threat in the home, vehicle, or workplace. These laws recognize a fundamental truth: law-abiding citizens should never be forced to flee their own homes or surrender to criminal threats. The castle doctrine specifically protects your home as your castle, where you have every right to defend yourself and your family with appropriate force. Stand-your-ground extends this principle beyond the home, allowing citizens to use force in public spaces when they face imminent threat of death or serious injury. Over 30 states have adopted stand-your-ground laws, and polling consistently shows these provisions enjoy strong public support across demographic lines.

Red-flag laws operate in 23 states, though they raise legitimate due-process questions. These extreme risk protection order laws allow courts to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed an imminent danger to themselves or others. While the intent to prevent mass shootings is understandable, implementation varies wildly. Some states provide robust due-process protections including notice, hearing rights, and legal representation. Others allow ex parte orders based on single complaints without the accused’s knowledge. The lack of consistent standards, combined with reports of abuse targeting political opponents or family members in custody disputes, demonstrates why conservatives insist that such laws include ironclad constitutional safeguards.

Universal background checks enjoy broad support, yet assault-weapon definitions remain a source of endless regulatory games. When surveys mention universal background checks in the abstract, support runs 80-90 percent. However, implementation reveals complications. Criminals don’t submit to background checks—they acquire firearms through theft or black markets. Meanwhile, the burden falls on law-abiding citizens seeking to exercise their rights. As for assault-weapon bans, they rest on cosmetic distinctions rather than functional ones. A rifle firing .223 ammunition at the same rate of fire as a non-banned competitor remains functionally identical; the only difference is ergonomic features like adjustable stocks or pistol grips. Courts increasingly recognize that such definitions fail constitutional scrutiny when examined honestly.

The American people deserve straight talk on this: our border security and national defense depend on the same spirit of self-reliance the Second Amendment embodies. Fiscal responsibility means rejecting endless new restrictions that punish law-abiding citizens while criminals ignore the rules. Consider that Chicago has some of the nation’s strictest gun laws yet suffers some of the nation’s highest gun homicide rates. Washington D.C. had a handgun ban for decades before Heller; did it prevent crime? The evidence overwhelmingly shows that good people with guns deter crime, while restrictions on good people don’t stop bad actors.

Women represent the fastest-growing demographic among gun owners, with participation up dramatically over the past decade. Many women cite self-defense as their primary motivation, particularly given police response times in rural areas and the reality that they may not be able to overpower physically larger attackers. Similarly, minority communities are increasingly exercising their Second Amendment rights. Hispanic, Black, and Asian American gun ownership has surged, yet these communities are often overlooked in national gun-rights discussions dominated by white voices. This diversification should unite all Americans around the principle that constitutional rights belong to everyone, regardless of race or background.

Constitutional principles are not suggestions—they are the foundation that keeps this republic intact. The Framers understood that tyranny often begins with disarmed populations. They enshrined the Second Amendment not for hunting or sport, but as a check against government overreach. That doesn’t mean lawlessness; it means that ordinary citizens retain the tools necessary to defend their families, their property, and their freedoms. Citizens should check their state statutes directly, because the patchwork of rules demands personal vigilance. Understanding your local laws isn’t just prudent—it’s essential for exercising your rights responsibly.